The Trust Tax of “Always Be Closing”

ABC = Always Be Closing

Buyers are on their own schedule and path, not yours

“Always Be Closing” is a well-established sales slogan that has survived for decades. On the surface, it makes sense. Businesses need sales. Deals need to close.

But closing is the result of a successful go-to-market process, not the objective of every interaction leading up to it. That distinction matters even more in marketing, because marketing cannot close buyers through a journey it does not control.

Modern B2B buyers research and make purchase decisions autonomously. They explore alternatives, consult peers, test claims and form opinions long before they are ready to speak with sales. Their purchase path is rarely linear, and most of it occurs outside the seller’s view or control.

What marketing can do is help them navigate it.

The trust tax of “always be closing”

The problem with an ABC mindset is not simply that it feels aggressive. It alters the mindset of marketing.

Instead of asking “what does a prospect want and need from each stage of the journey?the organization begins asking “what do we need this prospect to do next? Become a lead? Book a demo?  Talk to sales?

That is the difference between buyer-focused and inside-out marketing.  And the distinction shows up everywhere.

A prospect wants to understand an issue, but the content call-to-action is Book a Demo. They want to read a report the brand has prepared, but access requires contact information and placement into the MQL club. Prospects want to explore solution options and outcomes, but the vendor website is focused on “why us” and product features and promotional claims.

Individually, these may seem like minor points of friction. Collectively, they communicate something much larger:

What we need from you matters more than what you need from us.

And buyers notice.

Every inappropriate registration wall, premature CTA, overtly promotional article and persistent follow-up imposes an incremental trust tax on the relationship.

The buyer becomes a little more cautious about the next piece of content, a little less confident that advice is genuinely useful, a little more suspicious that providing information will trigger unwanted sales activity.

The cost isn’t limited to an abandoned form or ignored email — it shapes brand perception.

For companies selling complex, high-consideration solutions, that is an especially expensive trade. Buyers aren’t just evaluating features and price — they’re evaluating a vendor’s experience solving similar problems for others, whether they truly understand our unique challenges, and whether they trust the people behind the solution.

It is important to show prospects you understand their market and challenges, not just talk about it.

Help buyers progress

There is a better interpretation of ABC.

Always Be Advancing.

Advance their understanding. Give them a path to learn, compare and evaluate. Help them understand the business problem more clearly, recognize implications, consider alternatives and build internal consensus.

By helping prospects navigate their purchase path, you create the conditions in which the right buyers can comfortably move toward a sales conversation and, ultimately, a decision.

There is no universal marketing CTA. At some point, the right next step might be a demo or a conversation with sales — but rarely is it early in the process.

Sometimes the buyer needs an article, a comparison, a case study or an explanation of the process. Buyers want enough information to keep researching on their own path until they decide they are ready to be contacted.

Strategic marketing helps buyers progress. It makes those paths available without forcing buyers into a seller’s funnel. Brand trust is built on guidance, not ultimatums.

Why organizations fall into the trap

Inside-out marketing rarely begins with bad intentions. Every organization needs goals.

Sales teams have quotas. Product organizations have revenue projections. Marketing has lead goals and KPIs. All of that matters.

Larger organizations have silos and internal requests competing for attention. Smaller companies often build marketing organically, tactic by tactic, without an evolved brand strategy, defined buyer journey or content strategy.

Eventually internal culture and priorities begin driving a collection of individual tactics and random acts of marketing,  driven by internal forces rather than buyer needs.

More forms. More CTAs. More follow-up. More product promotions. More pressure to meet quotas and advance prospects internally, whether they are ready or not.

The solution is not to stop marketing and selling. After all, the purpose of the business is to create and keep a customer.

But prospects control the pace, path and process that leads to becoming a customer.

Closing is not a process, it is an outcome

B2B buyers need clarity to understand complex problems, enough business value to justify solving them, and enough trust in both the solution and the seller to choose a partner and a path forward. Organizations can make that process easier or add friction to it.

The “always be closing” mindset views every interaction as a transaction and is a symptom of an inside-out marketing organization.

Buyer-centered marketing optimizes around the buyer’s needs and purchase path, treating trust as the currency that lets a buyer choose one solution over another.

One asks, “How can we move this prospect to the next KPI?

The other asks, “How can we help this prospect move forward?

The difference may seem subtle, but to the buyer it rarely is.  And that difference compounds.

Trust isn’t earned in a single interaction. It is reinforced — or spent down — every time a prospect encounters your brand. A gated report, a premature demo CTA, a useful article, an honest comparison or a well-timed sales conversation each becomes evidence of whose interests the brand puts first.

Buyers don’t give much credit for a single moment of good behavior. They remember the pattern.

Over time, that pattern becomes part of the brand they decide whether to trust.

Closing isn’t a tactic; it is an outcome. It is the culmination of everything that came before it.


This article was originally published on Medium.

We’re Not Listening

Many B2B marketing and sales teams are on autopilot. I offer this series as observations and a belief that we can do better.

Many B2B marketing and sales teams are operating on autopilot.

That may sound harsh but consider the evidence. We have more access to customer feedback, market research, buyer behavior data, surveys, analytics, and industry insights than at any point in business history. Buyers constantly tell us what they want, what they value, what frustrates them, and how they make decisions.

Yet many organizations continue operating as if little has changed.

That disconnect is the topic of this series.

The Listening Gap

At its core, We’re Not Listening is a series of articles about the gap between what markets and customers are telling us, and how B2B organizations respond.

The problem is rarely a lack of information. Most companies already know that buyers are overwhelmed, skeptical, short on time, and increasingly resistant to marketing friction. They know trust is harder to earn. They know buying decisions involve more stakeholders, more scrutiny, and more risk than they once did.

The evidence is not hidden. The challenge has adaptation.

Knowing something has changed is not the same as changing because of it.

Over the years, I’ve noticed a pattern that appears across industries, business models, and company sizes. I call it the We’re Not Listening Loop:

  1. Markets & technology evolve.
  2. Buyers adapt.
  3. Research confirms the shift.
  4. Organizations acknowledge the evidence and invest in technology.
  5. Business go-to-market systems remain largely unchanged.

The cycle repeats.

New technologies emerge. New channels appear. New buyer expectations develop. Companies discuss the implications, attend conferences, publish reports, and commission research. Then many return to familiar habits, metrics, and assumptions.

The result is activity without meaningful adaptation.

Why It Happens

This is not a criticism of marketers, sales teams, or business leaders.

Most people are doing exactly what they were taught to do. They operate within systems, incentives, processes, and performance measures that were often designed for a different era.

Organizations frequently respond to disruption by adding new tools to old assumptions.

Digital transformation provided countless examples. Companies invested heavily in technology but often struggled to rethink the processes and behaviors surrounding it. Today, artificial intelligence presents many of the same challenges. The conversation quickly gravitates toward tools and tactics while deeper questions about strategy, relevance, trust, and buyer behavior receive less attention.

Technology changes quickly. Organizations often do not.

A Simple Example

Consider gated content.

For years, surveys have consistently shown that many B2B buyers dislike exchanging personal information for generic content. They want useful information. They are far less enthusiastic about the forms, emails, and sales sequences that often follow.

Yet gated content remains a standard practice across much of B2B marketing.

Why?

Because the system often rewards lead volume over buyer experience.

Whether one agrees with gating or not is almost beside the point. What interests me is the pattern. Buyers express a preference. Research validates it. Organizations acknowledge it. Behavior changes slowly, if at all.

The loop repeats.

What This Series Explores

This series examines the habits, assumptions, and blind spots that prevent organizations from becoming as buyer-centric as they claim to be.

Some articles will focus on brand strategy and positioning. Others will explore content, demand generation, sales enablement, buyer behavior, trust, differentiation, customer experience, digital transformation, and artificial intelligence.

The common thread is simple:

The common thread is simple: Objective clarity and opportunities to build prospect trust and confidence, and to improve marketing ROI.

If buyers do not understand what you do, who it is for, why it matters, how it is different, and why they should believe you, more activity rarely solves the issue. In many cases, it simply amplifies confusion.

This is especially true for organizations selling complex products, services, expertise, and solutions.

Marketing is not simply about creating attention. It is about creating understanding.

Sales is not simply about pursuing leads.

It is about helping buyers make sense of a decision.

Brand is not simply about looking polished.

It is about creating shared meaning that helps buyers, sellers, and internal teams move in the same direction.

When those things become disconnected, organizations drift into autopilot. The costs are real: wasted resources, weakened trust, frustrated sales teams, and confused buyers.

Why Follow Along?

The purpose of this series is not to argue that everything old is wrong or everything new is right.

Neither is true.

The goal is to challenge assumptions, ask better questions, and explore how organizations can become more responsive to the realities of modern buying.

For more than three decades, I’ve worked across startups, global enterprises, and independent consulting engagements. I’ve watched business evolve from the analog world of print, broadcast, and trade shows through digital transformation and now into the early stages of the AI era.

Technology continues its rapid evolution. Human behavior does not change so quickly.

Strategy sits in the space between them.

Michael Porter once observed, “The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do.” This series is, at least in part, an exploration of that idea.

Because sometimes the biggest business problem isn’t that we don’t know. It’s that we don’t adapt.

To customers, prospects and stakeholders – we’re not listening.


Thank you for reading, your thoughts and commentary are welcome. And I would be honored if you were to share it with someone that might find it relevant to their own business challenges.

This article was originally published on Medium and republished here.

Tools of Ignorance or Masters Degree in Strategy?

Many baseball fans are familiar with the expression “tools of ignorance.” It is credited, with some uncertainty, to both Muddy Ruel and Bill Dickey. If the phrase is new to you, here is one definition found in the April 4, 1944 issue of The Sporting News:


Muddy Ruel tags out Bing Miller.

“Players call the catcher’s armor the ‘tools of ignorance.’ Outfielders contend that no one in their senses would clutter themselves up with a mask, a heavy chest protector and weigh down their legs with shin guards. All of this when the mercury is trying to climb out of the top of the tube, and those outfielders are on vacation, waiting for something to happen.” 

photo – “Bing Miller tagged out at home plate by Muddy Ruel 1925” – image courtesy of Wikimedia


Avid fans are also likely aware of the fact that ex-catchers dominate the managerial role in Major League Baseball.

The 2014 MLB World Series is upon us. Both managers in this years fall classic are ex catchers – Bruce Botchy of the San Francisco Giants and Ned Yost of the Kansas City Royals. It’s not a coincidence. Catchers are accomplished strategists and team leaders.

Baseball loves statistics so let’s start with some numbers.

  • 43% (13 of 30 teams) – Former catchers in 2014 managing MLB teams.
  • 42.5% (17 of 40) – Former catchers recognized as American or National League Manager of the Year over the past two decades
  • 52.5% (21 of 40) – Former catchers who led their teams to the MLB World Series as managers in the past 20 years

Surprised? I’m not. The “tools of ignorance” are anything but.

Catchers play a unique role on the team. Analysis is a constant – every pitch, out, inning and game. They spend their careers behind the plate evaluating a series of “what if” questions, instantly profiling scenarios and making decisions designed to reach the best potential outcome. Like chess, baseball is a very situational game but with a much higher degree of personal interaction. Experienced catchers see the little things that make a difference in a game and in a series, both physically and psychologically. Those that pursue, excel and embrace the position are rewarded with an advanced education in tactical strategy and relationship management. Ned Yost and Bruce Botchy are this year’s World Series examples.

Nothing in this world has universal appeal. For some, watching baseball is the equivalent to watching grass grow. I’m not in that camp. I watched the grass grow from behind home plate where I grew up, matured and reached middle age. I’ve loved baseball for as long as I can remember. I grew up in the endless summers of Southern California where rain is rare and the worst of winter is the equivalent of fall in most other parts of the United States. Borrowing liberally from Roger Kahn’s book title “The Boys of Summer,” I was one of those boys, playing virtually every day as a kid. And I didn’t stop until I was forty-something.

Not everyone appreciates the impact participation in sports can have on a life. Athletics teach many, many things and the lessons are different for each sport, and each participant. I can only speak for myself, but in retrospect I leverage what learned from decades of baseball and catching every day – professionally and personally.

Here are many of the things catchers understand that help them excel at their position and as they adapt to new challenges:

  1. Teamwork – success and winning is directly proportional to how a team works together. Take care of teammates and they take care of you.
  2. Model scenarios quickly – every action has a reaction. Consider your goal, the likely outcomes of alternative options, and then make a decision.
  3. Leadership & communication – as catcher you’re view is unique to your role and position. Decide on the plan, communicate adjustments and ensure everyone understands the situation. Achieve this, and everyone is a better contributor.
  4. Trust your instincts and improvise when needed – situations often do not go as planned.
  5. Let go – learn from mistakes but don’t dwell on the past or what you can’t control.
  6. Perseverance – don’t give up, anything can happen even if it seems highly unlikely.
  7. Watch for and recognize the little things – they are important clues to improving future decisions.
  8. Adversity – it happens. Deal with it.
  9. Confidence and optimism – believe in yourself and your team. Fear of failure cannot guide you.
  10. Trust – in team, teammates, family and friends.
  11. Respect and empathy – everyone is doing their best. Bad days happen and those having them feel as crappy about it as you do when you have them. This includes umpires.
  12. Relationships matter – particularly pitchers and umpires. The better your relationship with each, the better the outcome.
  13. Managing up – Umpires can be your best friend or your worst enemy. Pick one.
  14. Make everyone better – it’s part of the job and by doing so, the team is better.

Please share. What are the important life-lessons athletics have brought you?


This article was originally published on LinkedIn on October 25, 2014 during the World Series.

Why? The delta between innovation objectives and abilities.

Innovation. A bridge too far?

A recent survey by the Palladium Group found that 93% of respondents believed that excellence in innovation would be critical to their success in the coming years. However, just 36% of the almost 1400 companies surveyed believed that they were good at innovating. In fact, most felt that they were poor at all forms of innovating – such as product/service and process innovation as well as business model innovation.

Innovation, a bridge too far?
A bridge too far? Can innovation be achieved in risk-averse cultures?
© Mikhail Shifrin | Dreamstime Stock Photos

Why is there such a massive gap between the importance of innovation and perceived abilities? Innovation means change, and change is hard.

What must organizations do to close this gap, and how can organizations manage innovation better?

The ability to execute on innovation in any form – whether the design of new products, services, processes or business models – is proportional to the ability of the collective team or organization to think and act in new ways.  Conceptualizing new models and designs is difficult, requiring creativity and commitment to see beyond current and historic influences. Execution on those designs, particularly in the context of organizational change, is infinitely harder.  Why? Human inertia; the same reason new years resolutions go unrealized.

Change is also culturally hard.  Who defines change? People.  Who executes change? People.  What defines your culture? Your people do, in combination with the context of your market.  Business cultures are uniquely complex and inherently resistant to change.  As Palladium’s 2014 survey states clearly, the inability to overcome internal resistance to change is a genuine problem. It is a human problem.

Palladium’s 2014 survey concludes, “Leadership for strategy execution is not confined to the top echelons of the enterprise but must be inculcated at every level.” Success will depend on instilling in everyone the need for change and committing to it at every level. This begins with “why.” Why is it important? Why do I care, why should I act differently? Capture the heart and the mind will follow; or at least begin to follow.

Active communication of why, consistently, transparently, and with conviction is the critical beginning which must be sustainable throughout the journey.   It must be open and ongoing, supporting “why” with what, how, where, when, and who, all of which must be clear and concise, measurable and connected like a song returning to the refrain of “why.”

Even with commitment from the heart – the intrinsic belief across the corporate culture of the need for innovation – and the all-important compass pointing to that destination, there are significant obstacles.  The journey begins with the roadmap of what must be done to execute on innovation.  However, there will also be a set of decisions that must be made collectively and individually that often prove more difficult.  It is the decision of what not to do, and the need to over-ride autopilot.

Autopilot is your worst enemy, making it hard to see things differently and think in new ways; autopilot is anti-innovation.  It is not as conscious and overt as “this is the way we’ve always done it,” rather it is the subconscious sibling, perhaps more insidious because it is silent and hidden. Autopilot thrives on past training, learned behaviors and legacy circumstance.  Innovation requires businesses to break that mold and make yesterday’s environment unrecognizable, so the focus on new objectives and patterns is clear and untainted by old habits.

“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”  -Albert Einstein.
——————

This article was originally written for the Palladium Group, appearing on their website in April, 2015.