The Trust Tax of “Always Be Closing”

ABC = Always Be Closing

Buyers are on their own schedule and path, not yours

“Always Be Closing” is a well-established sales slogan that has survived for decades. On the surface, it makes sense. Businesses need sales. Deals need to close.

But closing is the result of a successful go-to-market process, not the objective of every interaction leading up to it. That distinction matters even more in marketing, because marketing cannot close buyers through a journey it does not control.

Modern B2B buyers research and make purchase decisions autonomously. They explore alternatives, consult peers, test claims and form opinions long before they are ready to speak with sales. Their purchase path is rarely linear, and most of it occurs outside the seller’s view or control.

What marketing can do is help them navigate it.

The trust tax of “always be closing”

The problem with an ABC mindset is not simply that it feels aggressive. It alters the mindset of marketing.

Instead of asking “what does a prospect want and need from each stage of the journey?the organization begins asking “what do we need this prospect to do next? Become a lead? Book a demo?  Talk to sales?

That is the difference between buyer-focused and inside-out marketing.  And the distinction shows up everywhere.

A prospect wants to understand an issue, but the content call-to-action is Book a Demo. They want to read a report the brand has prepared, but access requires contact information and placement into the MQL club. Prospects want to explore solution options and outcomes, but the vendor website is focused on “why us” and product features and promotional claims.

Individually, these may seem like minor points of friction. Collectively, they communicate something much larger:

What we need from you matters more than what you need from us.

And buyers notice.

Every inappropriate registration wall, premature CTA, overtly promotional article and persistent follow-up imposes an incremental trust tax on the relationship.

The buyer becomes a little more cautious about the next piece of content, a little less confident that advice is genuinely useful, a little more suspicious that providing information will trigger unwanted sales activity.

The cost isn’t limited to an abandoned form or ignored email — it shapes brand perception.

For companies selling complex, high-consideration solutions, that is an especially expensive trade. Buyers aren’t just evaluating features and price — they’re evaluating a vendor’s experience solving similar problems for others, whether they truly understand our unique challenges, and whether they trust the people behind the solution.

It is important to show prospects you understand their market and challenges, not just talk about it.

Help buyers progress

There is a better interpretation of ABC.

Always Be Advancing.

Advance their understanding. Give them a path to learn, compare and evaluate. Help them understand the business problem more clearly, recognize implications, consider alternatives and build internal consensus.

By helping prospects navigate their purchase path, you create the conditions in which the right buyers can comfortably move toward a sales conversation and, ultimately, a decision.

There is no universal marketing CTA. At some point, the right next step might be a demo or a conversation with sales — but rarely is it early in the process.

Sometimes the buyer needs an article, a comparison, a case study or an explanation of the process. Buyers want enough information to keep researching on their own path until they decide they are ready to be contacted.

Strategic marketing helps buyers progress. It makes those paths available without forcing buyers into a seller’s funnel. Brand trust is built on guidance, not ultimatums.

Why organizations fall into the trap

Inside-out marketing rarely begins with bad intentions. Every organization needs goals.

Sales teams have quotas. Product organizations have revenue projections. Marketing has lead goals and KPIs. All of that matters.

Larger organizations have silos and internal requests competing for attention. Smaller companies often build marketing organically, tactic by tactic, without an evolved brand strategy, defined buyer journey or content strategy.

Eventually internal culture and priorities begin driving a collection of individual tactics and random acts of marketing,  driven by internal forces rather than buyer needs.

More forms. More CTAs. More follow-up. More product promotions. More pressure to meet quotas and advance prospects internally, whether they are ready or not.

The solution is not to stop marketing and selling. After all, the purpose of the business is to create and keep a customer.

But prospects control the pace, path and process that leads to becoming a customer.

Closing is not a process, it is an outcome

B2B buyers need clarity to understand complex problems, enough business value to justify solving them, and enough trust in both the solution and the seller to choose a partner and a path forward. Organizations can make that process easier or add friction to it.

The “always be closing” mindset views every interaction as a transaction and is a symptom of an inside-out marketing organization.

Buyer-centered marketing optimizes around the buyer’s needs and purchase path, treating trust as the currency that lets a buyer choose one solution over another.

One asks, “How can we move this prospect to the next KPI?

The other asks, “How can we help this prospect move forward?

The difference may seem subtle, but to the buyer it rarely is.  And that difference compounds.

Trust isn’t earned in a single interaction. It is reinforced — or spent down — every time a prospect encounters your brand. A gated report, a premature demo CTA, a useful article, an honest comparison or a well-timed sales conversation each becomes evidence of whose interests the brand puts first.

Buyers don’t give much credit for a single moment of good behavior. They remember the pattern.

Over time, that pattern becomes part of the brand they decide whether to trust.

Closing isn’t a tactic; it is an outcome. It is the culmination of everything that came before it.


This article was originally published on Medium.

We’re Not Listening

Many B2B marketing and sales teams are on autopilot. I offer this series as observations and a belief that we can do better.

Many B2B marketing and sales teams are operating on autopilot.

That may sound harsh but consider the evidence. We have more access to customer feedback, market research, buyer behavior data, surveys, analytics, and industry insights than at any point in business history. Buyers constantly tell us what they want, what they value, what frustrates them, and how they make decisions.

Yet many organizations continue operating as if little has changed.

That disconnect is the topic of this series.

The Listening Gap

At its core, We’re Not Listening is a series of articles about the gap between what markets and customers are telling us, and how B2B organizations respond.

The problem is rarely a lack of information. Most companies already know that buyers are overwhelmed, skeptical, short on time, and increasingly resistant to marketing friction. They know trust is harder to earn. They know buying decisions involve more stakeholders, more scrutiny, and more risk than they once did.

The evidence is not hidden. The challenge has adaptation.

Knowing something has changed is not the same as changing because of it.

Over the years, I’ve noticed a pattern that appears across industries, business models, and company sizes. I call it the We’re Not Listening Loop:

  1. Markets & technology evolve.
  2. Buyers adapt.
  3. Research confirms the shift.
  4. Organizations acknowledge the evidence and invest in technology.
  5. Business go-to-market systems remain largely unchanged.

The cycle repeats.

New technologies emerge. New channels appear. New buyer expectations develop. Companies discuss the implications, attend conferences, publish reports, and commission research. Then many return to familiar habits, metrics, and assumptions.

The result is activity without meaningful adaptation.

Why It Happens

This is not a criticism of marketers, sales teams, or business leaders.

Most people are doing exactly what they were taught to do. They operate within systems, incentives, processes, and performance measures that were often designed for a different era.

Organizations frequently respond to disruption by adding new tools to old assumptions.

Digital transformation provided countless examples. Companies invested heavily in technology but often struggled to rethink the processes and behaviors surrounding it. Today, artificial intelligence presents many of the same challenges. The conversation quickly gravitates toward tools and tactics while deeper questions about strategy, relevance, trust, and buyer behavior receive less attention.

Technology changes quickly. Organizations often do not.

A Simple Example

Consider gated content.

For years, surveys have consistently shown that many B2B buyers dislike exchanging personal information for generic content. They want useful information. They are far less enthusiastic about the forms, emails, and sales sequences that often follow.

Yet gated content remains a standard practice across much of B2B marketing.

Why?

Because the system often rewards lead volume over buyer experience.

Whether one agrees with gating or not is almost beside the point. What interests me is the pattern. Buyers express a preference. Research validates it. Organizations acknowledge it. Behavior changes slowly, if at all.

The loop repeats.

What This Series Explores

This series examines the habits, assumptions, and blind spots that prevent organizations from becoming as buyer-centric as they claim to be.

Some articles will focus on brand strategy and positioning. Others will explore content, demand generation, sales enablement, buyer behavior, trust, differentiation, customer experience, digital transformation, and artificial intelligence.

The common thread is simple:

The common thread is simple: Objective clarity and opportunities to build prospect trust and confidence, and to improve marketing ROI.

If buyers do not understand what you do, who it is for, why it matters, how it is different, and why they should believe you, more activity rarely solves the issue. In many cases, it simply amplifies confusion.

This is especially true for organizations selling complex products, services, expertise, and solutions.

Marketing is not simply about creating attention. It is about creating understanding.

Sales is not simply about pursuing leads.

It is about helping buyers make sense of a decision.

Brand is not simply about looking polished.

It is about creating shared meaning that helps buyers, sellers, and internal teams move in the same direction.

When those things become disconnected, organizations drift into autopilot. The costs are real: wasted resources, weakened trust, frustrated sales teams, and confused buyers.

Why Follow Along?

The purpose of this series is not to argue that everything old is wrong or everything new is right.

Neither is true.

The goal is to challenge assumptions, ask better questions, and explore how organizations can become more responsive to the realities of modern buying.

For more than three decades, I’ve worked across startups, global enterprises, and independent consulting engagements. I’ve watched business evolve from the analog world of print, broadcast, and trade shows through digital transformation and now into the early stages of the AI era.

Technology continues its rapid evolution. Human behavior does not change so quickly.

Strategy sits in the space between them.

Michael Porter once observed, “The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do.” This series is, at least in part, an exploration of that idea.

Because sometimes the biggest business problem isn’t that we don’t know. It’s that we don’t adapt.

To customers, prospects and stakeholders – we’re not listening.


Thank you for reading, your thoughts and commentary are welcome. And I would be honored if you were to share it with someone that might find it relevant to their own business challenges.

This article was originally published on Medium and republished here.

As An Author, Self-Promotion Is The Hardest Part

As author, self-promotion is the hardest part.

I knew it wouldn’t be easy.

I don’t mean writing a book, though I knew that would be challenging.

Promoting it.  I knew self-promotion would be the most challenging aspect. But the reasons might surprise some people.

“I would not have expected that,” a friend and former colleague told me when I confided in her.  “You’re in marketing, you of all people should find promoting your book easier than someone who knows nothing of how it works.” She’s not wrong.

I do know how to do it.  That’s the irony. I’ve been a marketing professional for over three decades.  I know marketing.

To be fair, not all marketing is the same.  Tactics and variables can vary widely from one market and buyer to another.  Marketing a book is quite different than marketing corporate healthcare. However, the fundamentals remain, and I understand them well.  The book itself is testimony.  That’s not the problem.

It’s not that I don’t know what to do.  It’s that doing it – promoting myself – is something I’ve always been self-conscious about. I come from the show-don’t-tell philosophy. It’s always better when someone else does the telling.

It’s a challenge that has haunted me throughout my professional life as both an owner and consultant.

I discounted the promotion early in the book’s development as I did not expect to do much marketing.  I didn’t write it expecting a best seller and steady royalties.  It’s a business book, a niche one at that.  The goal of writing a book was for market authority and as a positioning anchor. It was conceived as a marketing resource and inbound signal.

Promoting the book makes me feel like I’m on a soapbox extolling my virtues to anyone in range of my social media shouts.  In fact, there have been very few posts.  The limited promotion I have done is via LinkedIn messages to friends and professional connections. But my LinkedIn connections are not representative of my target audience. It did, however, give me a reason to reach out and reconnect. Somehow, the existing relationship makes it a bit easier to share the news.

I need to get over it if I’m to improve my awareness outreach, but it somehow makes me feel cheap and dirty, so I resist, procrastinate, and overthink it.

The real irony is that it has become more stressful.  I’ve wasted time dreading the tactic and dragging my feet rather than focusing and getting it done.  It’s all the baggage with none of the rewards.

I know I need to get over it.  Maybe that’s what led to this story?  Maybe?


This article was originally published on Medium


Ed Youngblood is a B2B brand and marketing strategist. His book, B2B Brand Strategy, provides frameworks and tools for building strategic brands without an agency (and was the inspiration for this commentary). It is available on Amazon and other leading sellers as e-book and paperback to fit your reading preference.

To Gate, Or Not To Gate? A Question As Old As Digital Delivery

Marketing Charts — https://www.marketingcharts.com/industries/business-to-business-108001

Why gate content? Leads. Gating content is about generating leads say 62% of B2B organizations as recently reported by Marketing Charts. And, though the answer to “why” surprises no one, the summary of the research they published highlights some interesting responses and related metrics worth deeper consideration.

Several of the highlights are intriguing:
“45% of respondents believe gating content adds an air of exclusivity to it.” I think users have quite an opposite reaction to gated content and see through that.
• As for the leads generated at the gate, the data is never as clean as hoped. 47% provide personal email (or a dedicated junk mail account address)
31% refuse the transaction cost of providing personal information for content. 45% of VP-level decision makers refuse.

Gating is a barrier to audience trust and the mission of your content. Period. Full stop.

Gating is as old as content marketing. It is the digital descendant of event raffles and the aggressive corralling of wanderlust trade show attendees for badge IDs. Tactically speaking, it is what marketing has always done — support sales and generate leads. I understand the rationale.

But the conversation and decision about gating content must go deeper. In fact, the simplicity of the question — to gate or not to gate — betrays a strategic and deliberate approach to the role of content today. Too often, the check-mark is defined simply by content classification rather than audience personalization such as role, journey stage and opt-in alternatives. Consider first how and where your content fits a prospect’s discovery path; does it meet their specific needs?

Faced with the question to gate or not to gate content, the first and most important question to consider is if, in the eyes of your audience, the content is worthy of the transaction cost. Most content is not. In fact, the 2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study concludes that quality thought leadership is scarce — only 18% of business leaders consider vendor content excellent or very good. But take note, the impact of quality content is real and has a measurable impact on trust and reputation. 70% of decision makers will follow an author or organization that brings value (and not promotion). Conversely, “done poorly, it can harm business.” 60% of decision makers will stop following authors or organizations after reading thought leadership while 29% decided not to award business because of their thought leadership (or lack of it). Your content better be in that 18% of excellent/very good or risk the disappointment and loss of trust from your audience.

Gating is an internally focused tactic that ignores emergent trust and relationship challenges every digital business faces today. It also over-simplifies buyer behavior in complex sales cycles. But I understand the rationale, marketing is doing what marketing has been trained to do — support sales & generate leads.

There is an ironic and important paradox here. The chorus of business leaders and analysts evangelizing the importance of a more personalized and empathetic, customer experience — from end-to-end — has been rising for years now. Gating content is a contradiction.

Is there a place in the engagement process for requesting and acquiring prospect information? Yes, absolutely. Generating interest and sales opportunities is the heart of the marketing mission. Webinars are an example of a registration-required format that users readily accept. They understand there can be logistical limits and requirements when “live.” It also demonstrates legitimate audience interest by the act of registration and a calendar commitment to attend.

I’m all for strong content that informs prospects and can drive well qualified leads for sales. To be clear, it’s vital to create opportunities for users to provide personal info, but how and when you do it matters. Invoking “pay to play” access early in a prospect journey, before trust or authority has been earned, will close many doors that would otherwise remain open.

The Takeaways
1. Demand generation is a marathon. Slow down, nurture digital relationships and allow them to evolve. Trust and authority are earned, it’s not an algorithm.

2. Show, don’t tell; inform, educate and demonstrate why your solutions matter. Stop selling and stop talking about yourself; let your subject expertise be the star. Your trust and authority scores will increase immediately.

3. Be creative in creating opt-in opportunities like webinars that will demonstrate expertise, insight and customer value. Give your audience a reason to want to explore a relationship with your business. The prospect data you earn will be cleaner, will yield more productive nurture programs and increase lead quality.

Building trust and relationships have always been the first rule of sales success. Just because buyers don’t engage with sales until late in the sales cycle doesn’t mean prospects aren’t judging you. The importance of developing buyer-seller relationships based on trust and authority remain, but how those relationships evolve has been redefined. Until a buyer decides to speak to a salesperson, your digital behavior and your content is your salesperson.


This commentary was first published on Medium on Apr 17, 2019

Open letter from a CMO to a CIO

Dear IT,

You and I both know the history of our relationship has not been particularly close over the years. A decade ago we shared few interests, but things have changed. Where once we had little in common, today we need each other to be successful. I hope you agree.

Lately, I‘ve felt the need to share some disturbing visions I keep having. Understandably, your first thought might be “I hardly know you, why bring this problem to me?” Because you too are experiencing tremendous pressure and change in your role as CIO, which tells me you can empathize. And frankly, I need to share it with someone who can appreciate my pain.  I hope you’ll hear me out.

Sleepless Marketing Leader

I haven’t slept well in months. I keep having recurring dreams that when I’m at work, I have blocks of cement on my feet. Every time I try to affect change or adapt to changing customer trends, I can barely move. And, I’m not alone. My team is wearing lead shoes, as are so many others. The dream has different outcomes, but none end well. That’s when I typically wake up.

Again, you ask yourself “Why me?” I’ll explain.

As I was reading Forrester’s Digital Business Imperative report the other day, I was painfully reminded of the growing impact digital everything is having on our personal and professional lives. Traditional marketing tactics are no longer relevant and plug-and-play is no longer enough for either one of us. As CIO, you appreciate the steep challenge of digital evolution; after all, you and your teams are on the front lines, defining and managing technology.  Lets be honest with each other, both our classical measures of value are barely relevant today.

Forrester pointedly states how urgently business leaders must harness digital technologies, not only to deliver the digital experience customers expect but also to increase competitive market position. Digital is transforming our business in every way, at a pace that feels like it’s virtually overnight. Though the analysts refer to it as “transformation,” it feels a lot more like revolution.

How’s this for revolution – Gartner predicts that by 2017, marketing will control more IT budget and technology than you will? As a marketing leader I find that prediction staggering. I don’t mind telling you that we are not equipped to go it alone. Though I remain unconvinced of their prediction, I do know that we need each other to be successful. We need to work together. I’m convinced it’s time for a reset.

I’ve come to realize lately that we hardly know each other after all these years. In fact, I suspect that our perceptions of each other, our roles and our organizations, are fundamentally wrong.   Though our professional paths have been quite different, customers, technology and digital business are common threads redefining both our professions in ways we never imagined, and insisting we redefine ourselves. To be honest, I welcome the challenge.

Most important, we need to get ahead of the curve strategically, or we will slip further behind operationally and financially. There is a lot of change for us to manage and we cannot continue to bolt new technologies onto old models. So the question before us is how, when and where do we begin?

Sincerely,

Your new best friend,
Marketing
———–

This article was originally published on LinkedIn Pulse on June 30, 2015.